Last Thursday
(7/13/17), the New York Times’ Style
section featured a number of people admitting that they’ve
developed quite an attachment to their Amazon Alexa “bot.”
Whether “ideal roommate,” “a cross between a mistress and a
nurse,” or “perfect woman, (who) never says, ‘Not tonight,
dear,’” we seem
deeply drawn to this disembodied, but friendly, voice in the dark.
Media scholars understand
that this allure is nothing new. It recapitulates our
earlier fascination and deep emotional attachment to our telephones.
Marshall McLuhan, writing in
the 1950’s, asked:
Why
should the phone create an intense feeling of loneliness? Why
should we feel compelled to answer a ringing public phone when we
know the call cannot concern us? Why does a phone ringing on the
stage create instant tension? Why is that tension so very much less
for an unanswered phone in a movie scene? The answer to all of these
questions is simply that the phone is a participant form that demands
a partner, with all the intensity of electric polarity.
As
I wrote in Digital Dharma,
“a quality of intense longing has permeated the social history of
telephony from the moment of its birth.” As opposed to the
declarative texts of telegraphy and its modern rebirth as texting
and Twitter, the telephone
represented what Erik Davis has called the “ultimate animist
technology… an inert thing full of voices,” – a technology of
feelings, wants and desires.
While
first seen as a business tool, limited to the male domain of
business, government and the military, the telephone, by the 1920’s
had become a domestic
appliance, moving from the ordered left-brain-dominant realm of the
alphabet, to the flowing, musical, feminine right-brain space of the
voice. It was deeply unsettling to the established patriarchal social
order: it empowered women in numerous ways, along with lovers,
pranksters, and criminals. It was, in the words of historian Robert
MacDougall, “a lawless thing, at times dangerous, at others
sexualized, at others juvenile.”
[See
DD p. 36-42, for a
discussion of the
impact of the telephone’s
“call to intimacy.”]
I
believe that the telephone
and its new forms as responsive “voice bots,” can be seen as
extensions of our Second
Chakra’s
hunger for deep connection: at its best, drawing us into places of
intimate sharing and community; and at its worst, fostering
dependence and unhealthy emotional attachments. As we talk less and
less on our phones, interacting with the world through our eyes, it
is no surprise that our primal prewired attachment to the intimacy
of the human voice is
reasserting itself through these new devices. Our inner
challenge before
we fully engage with these external “voice whisperers,” is
to create our own internal “voice
of validation,” clearing old attachments and disconnecting the
stuck cords to the unhealthy
belief systems of our inner
wounded children. With
these cords of communication cleared, we can truly enjoy our newfound
talking, Cloud-connected, playful
electronic friends.
No comments:
Post a Comment